CAAST and FLOSS - Acronym Wars
CAAST and FLOSS - Acronym Wars
Posted Dec 31, 2002 23:35 UTC (Tue) by ericbr (guest, #5904)In reply to: CAAST and FLOSS - Acronym Wars by cdmiller
Parent article: CAAST and FLOSS - Acronym Wars
Wow. What an amazing set of non-answers. How typical of a Linux fan - when the questions get too hard to answer, change the subject. (And, by the way, thanks for the psychoanalysis - again, so typical of a Linux fan. <sarcasm>Your genius is overwhelming. </sarcasm>)
Again, why do various linux programs not even manage to make the SCROLLBARS work consistently? These are the basic DOCUMENTATION BROWSERS, for crying out loud. If Microsoft shipped programs that were this inconsistent, you would be up in arms about it - and rightly so.
Also - perhaps you haven't noticed this, but SOURCE CODE is NOT documentation. If I want to figure out how to open a file, I'm sure as hell not going to start a text editor to browse through a couple megabytes of OpenOffice source code. And I'm a programmer - source code isn't going to help non-programmers.
As for RPMs - can you name some of these distributions that solve the dependency problem? Do they work with third-party RPMs (e.g., from oh, say, FreshMeat, since that's where this whole discussion started in the first place)?
As for flphoto, my point was that 1) it was described as a photo-management suite, and 2) as a photo-management suite, it left a lot to be desired. Win32 programs like (say) ThumbsPlus, which I wouldn't really describe as a sophisticated photo-management program, are far more sophisticated than flphoto appears to be. Therefore, I'm not terribly interested in *using* flphoto, much less *improving* it.
Linux - for people without a life.
