Non-free software is divisive and harmful. [LWN.net]

Non-free software is divisive and harmful.

Posted Jun 16, 2006 11:42 UTC (Fri) by cpm (guest, #3554)
In reply to: Non-free software is divisive and harmful. by ekj
Parent article: Google Earth for Linux

"The dataset is many orders of magnitude more valuable, and many orders of magnitude more work to gather and maintain than the viewer by the way. The real coup would be to get one or more of the many government-owned mapping-organisations to release their data under a free license. Arguably that data has already been bougth and paid for by the tax-payers."

Wholly agree.

This is a real buggaboo imho. There are dozens if not hundreds of
(wholly)taxpayer funded GIS projects either started or matured every
year, who owns the data? And yes, you can be certain that someone
owns it.

Right now, I'm aware of a not-for-profit that might be shutting down.
they have gigabytes of GIS databases, that various state and federal
agencies as well other not-for-profit agencies have paid for. Who gets
the data?

I'm not articulate enough to express this concern. Whenever I try to
speak to folks about it, they start looking at me like I'm from mars
or something.

"whaddya mean 'who owns it?'"

What ever happened to public domain?

to post comments

Non-free software is divisive and harmful.

Posted Jun 21, 2006 23:39 UTC (Wed) by omez (guest, #6904) [Link]

"I'm aware of a not-for-profit that might be shutting down.
they have gigabytes of GIS databases, that various state and federal
agencies as well other not-for-profit agencies have paid for. Who gets
the data?"

Answer: Nobody. Just because it's in some another organizations's database, doesn't mean it's up for grabs when they bite the dust. Those state and federal agencies tend to retain copyright to thier GIS products.