I think I'm missing a point, somewhere in the following para:
I think the only thing you missed is that driver != child. The article speaks of parent-driver communication; you conflated that to parent-child communication (or so it appears).
Apologies if I've misunderstood your misunderstanding. ;-)
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds