|From:||Andi Kleen <ak-AT-suse.de>|
|To:||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-osdl.org>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation|
|Date:||Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:05:18 +0100|
|Cc:||Andi Kleen <ak-AT-suse.de>, mingo-AT-elte.hu, dhowells-AT-redhat.com, torvalds-AT-osdl.org, hch-AT-infradead.org, arjan-AT-infradead.org, matthew-AT-wil.cx, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-arch-AT-vger.kernel.org|
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andi Kleen <email@example.com> wrote: > > > > Can you please apply the following patch then? > > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement > > OK. > > Thus far I have this: Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain. -Andi
Copyright © 2005, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds