|From:||Alan Hicks <alan-AT-lizella.net>|
|Subject:||The end of USENET|
|Date:||Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:52:07 -0500|
On the grand scale, I'm a relative newcomer to the wonder of USENET. When I first started looking for a news feed, I heard the popular misconception that USENET is just a repository for spammers, useless for anything beyond binaries, and a breeding ground for trolls. That didn't stop me from checking it out just the same, and what I found was rather pleasant. To begin with, USENET has its share of spam. No place online is free of it these days. However, the presence of spam on USENET tells me one thing for certain: "People use USENET". Spammers are by no means incompetent; they do not waste their time sending their messages places they aren't going to find many people. Thus when you see spam on USENET, it is almost always in large binary newsgroups which may be visited by thousands if not millions of people each day. Text- only newsgroups are remarkably devoid of spam. I see perhaps one spam message in the half dozen newsgroups I regularly read every two or three weeks at worst. As a medium for intelligent discussion, USENET still ranks head and shoulders above other popular discussion venues such as IRC and web forums, and is on par with mailing lists. Unlike web forums and IRC channels, USENET discussions tend to be in greater depth on difficult issues. A day spent on USENET typically reveals something you might not have considered before. Besides the perpetual vi vs. emacs holy wars (go vi!), one can find discussions about setting up udev rules for specific hotplug USB devices, techniques for cross-compiling OSS for another architecture, or the minimum size of an LED (all discussions I've seen this week). The depth and breadth of knowledge found on USENET simply can't be found anywhere else. Many ISPs are dropping support for USENET because it's too expensive to maintain the push delivery system for so few people that use it, but that hardly equates to the death of USENET. If a smaller market means death, IBM should have been dead years ago, Apple has one foot in the grave, Slackware is a zombie, and BSD is a ghost. Of course all of these are successful with a smaller piece of their respective "markets" and USENET is really no different. What you've seen is not the death of USENET, but the marginalization of it. USENET is not a place the hoi poloi go to discuss the latest pop star's love affair with the latest movie star, and thank God it isn't! USENET is moving away from a technology used by the masses to a technology used for the discussion of technical topics. As a relative newcomer to USENET, I cannot say with any personal experience that early USENET was predominately dominated by technical discussion. However, I do believe that is the direction it is moving. This means the future for USENET is bright as a discussion medium for all sorts of intellectual pursuits. Those people who want USENET can easily get it whether their ISP delivers it as a free service or not. The success of paid NNTP offerings like news.individual.net (which only offers access text newsgroups) are proof positive that USENET will continue to flourish. Additionally, USENET has become a medium for anonymous exchange of binaries due to the recent attacks on P2P software. Most of these binaries are of course, copyrighted material that is being distributed illegally. While I do not condone such actions, I also realize that enough people out there use them to keep USENET alive for a long time to come, even if only as a paid service. Feel free to publish this in the "Letters to the Editor" page if you wish. I felt like my thoughts were too large to put as a comment attached to the story. -- It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, Than for a man to hear the song of fools. Ecclesiastes 7:5
Page editor: Forrest Cook
Copyright © 2005, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds