User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Filesystems are dead, or should die

Filesystems are dead, or should die

Posted Sep 23, 2005 11:39 UTC (Fri) by job (guest, #670)
In reply to: Filesystems are dead, or should die by eff-tech
Parent article: Reiser4 and kernel inclusion

"Feature rich" is not a one dimentional variable. One might consider the Plan 9 file system to be very feature rich, i.e. you can do a lot of stuff with it that you can't do with POSIX file systems. But it achieves this in the fine tradition of being composed of very well defined extremely simple components.

I don't think portability is a goal in itself. It is good to achieve whenever possible, but must not reduce systems to their least common denominator. There must also be room for new developments. On the other hand, if you think of pure research systems such as EROS as even better, we probably agree on this point anyway.


(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds