|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Boy, you are confused (oldSCO aka Santa Cruz vs newSCO aka Caldera)

Boy, you are confused (oldSCO aka Santa Cruz vs newSCO aka Caldera)

Posted Sep 17, 2005 18:34 UTC (Sat) by mmarq (guest, #2332)
In reply to: Boy, you are confused (oldSCO aka Santa Cruz vs newSCO aka Caldera) by rev
Parent article: Chart of SCO's Answer to Novell's Counterclaims (Groklaw)

" The Ransom Love interview, CEO of Caldera at the time, shows that Caldera had a different motive in purchasing Santa Cruz, aka oldSCO, namely it was intereset in Santa Cruz's resellers channel. This falsifies the above assertion. "

No, i never said that Caldera had that intention. What i said was that when the NEW SCO was incorporated (the name changed from Caldera to SCO) it was already with the intension of delivering the SCO source campaingn...

I dont know no one personaly but i belive Ransom Love had a completely different idea, and was unjustly removed...

And even if i'm wrong and was not "Darl&Cª" who finneshed the deal, i make no delusions, because no senior manager makes **such a mistake** of resorting to a strategy (like the SCO source) to make another company rich. Because if "SCO source" could ever had been such a clear shot, as "Darl&Cª" makes belive, other much bigger institutions like Sun or even IBM, would had pick it up long before Caldera. I repeat:

"When **(new)SCO** was incorporated its management surely knew this situation. It was a BAD BUSINESS from any angle you look at it, and from the very begining. I dont belive that Darl&Cª had ever the defect of being stupids."

... unless there was another business after all... And that would VERY VERY hardly be the substancial grow of the OpenServer/Unixware in a relatively short time(belive no one sensible would ever bet a cent on it, in the 200x IT clima), short enough for not depleting SCO with long intense R&D costs. Pump & Dump can only be very short lived, and Darl&Cª are not facing jail and probably never will, because with *governance* allowance businesses have trended to become immoral (Enron, Worlcom...SCO)

Sorry but you dont invalidate the question of who/What made "Darl&Cª" to jump out off the cliff.


to post comments

Boy, you are confused (oldSCO aka Santa Cruz vs newSCO aka Caldera)

Posted Sep 17, 2005 19:10 UTC (Sat) by rev (guest, #15082) [Link] (1 responses)

Ok, glad to have that misunderstanding rectified. (However, since you used the words Santa Cruz was purchased and SCO formed only to launch the SCO Intellectual Property campaingn..)

Boy, you are confused (oldSCO aka Santa Cruz vs newSCO aka Caldera)

Posted Sep 17, 2005 19:35 UTC (Sat) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link]

But that is it!. the only diference in words could be:

The (old) SCO Unix business was purchased by Caldera, and then the (new)SCO formed only(or with primary intention) to launch the SCO Intellectual Property campaingn..

... i know, i should make better attention to the wording.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds