|From:||Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-osdl.org>|
|To:||David Teigland <teigland-AT-redhat.com>|
|Subject:||Re: GFS, what's remaining|
|Date:||Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:59:39 -0700|
|Cc:||linux-fsdevel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-cluster-AT-redhat.com, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org|
David Teigland <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > Hi, this is the latest set of gfs patches, it includes some minor munging > since the previous set. Andrew, could this be added to -mm? Dumb question: why? Maybe I was asleep, but I don't recall seeing much discussion or exposition of - Why the kernel needs two clustered fileystems - Why GFS is better than OCFS2, or has functionality which OCFS2 cannot possibly gain (or vice versa) - Relative merits of the two offerings etc. Maybe this has all been thrashed out and agreed to. If so, please remind me.
Copyright © 2005, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds