User: Password:
|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: New stacker performance results

From:  James Morris <jmorris-AT-redhat.com>
To:  Stephen Smalley <sds-AT-tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject:  Re: New stacker performance results
Date:  Wed, 25 May 2005 10:55:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc:  linux-security-module-AT-wirex.com
Archive-link:  Article, Thread

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Stephen Smalley wrote:

> - using SELinux as the shared framework and directly integrating them
> into it so that they can leverage its policy abstractions as well and
> serve to reinforce the access controls rather than being redundant.

Given that nobody has come up with an upstream alternative to SELinux 
since the merging of LSM, this should certainly be considered.

In fact, there has recently been some discussion about removing LSM
completely and just using SELinux directly.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@redhat.com>





(Log in to post comments)


Copyright © 2005, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds