What the Linux Desktop Needs (OS Views) [LWN.net]

What the Linux Desktop Needs (OS Views)

Posted May 21, 2005 5:38 UTC (Sat) by hmmm (guest, #28931)
Parent article: What the Linux Desktop Needs (OS Views)

Whiners!

If you want your commercial software to run on and be included with all Linux distrobutions by default then open source it.

If you want to keep the source closed then release a staticly compiled binary version of it.

If you want to integrate it into a distro then do it, release your software targetted for specific distributions and maintain your own mess. You chose this path, nobody twisted your arm to make things this difficult for you. Suck it up. Bitch.

http://www.blender3d.org/cms/Blender.31.0.html

Notice these professional have no problem supporting all Linux distros with binary releases. If you do, you suck.

to post comments

This is what the Linux Desktop does NOT Need

Posted May 21, 2005 13:41 UTC (Sat) by sdalley (subscriber, #18550) [Link] (1 responses)

You are a guest here. It behoves guests to play by the house rules of "polite, respectful, and informative", as the rest of us try to do. Subscribers do not enjoy paying for the privilege of reading abuse that can be had for free any day on slashdot.

Regarding your points, you will note that NoMachine.com *already* release product for 15 different Linux dists. Is this possible? Of course. Does it create support and maintenance headaches? Again, of course. Is it off-putting for new entrants? Again, of course.

We make Linux better by quietly improving the tools and the infrastructure, not by ranting and raving at vendors who are doing just that, and scaring off others who might otherwise seriously consider it.

This is what the Linux Desktop does NOT Need

Posted May 22, 2005 2:46 UTC (Sun) by hmmm (guest, #28931) [Link]

You're right, that was a bit rude. I'll try to keep that kinda rage for osnews.

However. Should we do everything in our power to cater to proprietary software dealers?

How much time or money should we spend out of our own pocket to do it?

Unnecessary synchronous stability in a distributed development model can cost a lot of time and possibly slow the rate of progress, if nothing else.

Maybe they should pay for stability.

The customer, for the privelege of running a stable OS like RHEL or SuSE with support for commercial apps, is the one who is paying today.

But I think once there are enough people using it, once there is a market for commercial software on it, the apps will be happily ported over. They just want sales in very large numbers. They follow the carrot.

If Apple released OSX for the PC I bet most PC games would be ported in no time. The market would explode for OSX software on X86, so many people would be running it. The same thing will happen for Linux when its ready.

But it isn't ready, just yet. And if the vendors aren't prepared when it is ready they will have to spend the money to catch up. Not our problem.

The point is everyone gets equal opportunity to be part of the Linux Desktop. Nobody gets special treatment. Secret closed-door meetings to put an AOL icon on your desktop will not be tolerated here. Competition is fierce. Either keep up or quit.