Clueless
Clueless
Posted Dec 2, 2004 19:05 UTC (Thu) by Boobis (guest, #533)In reply to: Clueless by thompsot
Parent article: Debian and the hot babe problem
Thank you for making such a perfect example of what I was trying to say. Too bad you are just plain wrong. The feminist movement are very much needed in the us and women are not treated as equals at all, or do you actually believe that the reason you have not had a single female president is that women are less suited to the task? The fact that some countries are even worse doesn't make women equal in the US.
Anyhow women should not have to put up with their bodies being comoditized, and hot-babe is one step in that direction.
Posted Dec 2, 2004 22:36 UTC (Thu)
by thompsot (guest, #12368)
[Link] (4 responses)
One thing I will definitely agree with you on however:
Sadly though, rather than hot-babe being just "one step in that direction", it's yet another product (out of billions) of the current culture that has taken hold, where those absorbed with the perverted idea of what women and/or sexuality are (which the porn industry has created and exacerbated) will forever be clueless as to why themes suggesting group sex or naked women with huge breasts are not only innapropriate, but socially destructive. We are not socially or culturally "enlightend" when there is nothing sacred or special anymore or when we shed all our inhibitions, we merely become more debased and simplistic, like animals. Contrast the age of chivalry and romance with a couple of dogs "doing it" on the side of the road. That's a picture of where we've come from and where we're headed.
All in all though, I'm still a huge Debian fan and will continue to use it. There are a few other debian packages that are offensive as well, but they are not installed by default and shouldn't be. As a general rule, if you can't put it on an enterprise desktop or a family PC that your kids will use, then it shouldn't be there by default. However, if Debian someday becomes a dumping ground for packages by perverts and people who have become numb to healthy moral and social standards, then I might reconsider and use a distribution that doesn't have that kind of baggage. I'm inclined to think though, that there are enough people with common sense working on Debian to keep it clean for the most part for a long time to come.
Posted Dec 5, 2004 9:42 UTC (Sun)
by Saigua (guest, #6069)
[Link]
...'course, for this comment, I'm tossing in that it's also a behavioral device for associating naked hotness with howling fans and thermostatically-throttled CPUs, which is an odd decision; the operator is compelled to either overbook CPU and guarantee that the nude is mere decoration, or guard modesty and silence to the fault of staring at the black of the garb.
Last week I visited a gay-hazing ecumenical. 12 and 24V molex sockets were everywhere and there was a definite fetish for the orange UV fans. Same-gender sex and fan noise were everywhere, and nobody would take off their black body socks. Eventually one man was expelled for packing too many fans inside his kuddl-duds, which was an oddly oversexed thing to do. Myself, I had to get out of that turtleneck. That inhibition reeked.
Maybe if the garment were more dynamic, or tore, I could tell from that how my CPU was; or more likely, laugh at mod-lm_sensors as it misreported -82 deg. farenheit measurements. Is that a gnunitard and ski-boots, honeychild? ooh! I'm hiding something socially destructive in my individuality too!
Posted Dec 9, 2004 18:35 UTC (Thu)
by etbe (subscriber, #17516)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Dec 9, 2004 21:19 UTC (Thu)
by thompsot (guest, #12368)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Dec 10, 2004 1:26 UTC (Fri)
by etbe (subscriber, #17516)
[Link]
You're welcome.Clueless
"Anyhow women should not have to put up with their bodies being comoditized, and hot-babe is one step in that direction."
It's a CPU monitor! With Artistic License! 'nuff!Design for Frustration by Contract
When was the "age of chivalry and romance", was that when women were not Clueless
permitted to vote? Was that when it was legal for a man to beat his
wife? Was that when women were expected to be subservient to men in
every way?
I prefer modern values, and I suspect that women who think about the
issues and read history books do too.
Actually, that's when men treated women like they were jewels and were expected to win a woman's heart the hard way, not just hop into bed with her on the first date, and there was a certain expectation of good behavior on both parts. Sorry you misunderstood.Clueless
Thompsot, one thing you are really clueless about is history. Clueless
It's a really modern idea that a couple spend months or years dating
before getting married. Arranged marriages have historically been common
in all cultures, as have situations where women had no economic options
other than to get married.
The idea that men should "win a woman's heart the hard way" is a very
sexist idea that you generally only see in the trashiest fiction books
(Mills and Boone). Ever considered the possibility that women should
"win a man's heart the hard way and not just hop into bed with him on the
first date"? It takes the agreement of both parties for sex on a first
date (or any date for that matter). Why should it be the man's fault if
the woman wants sex on a first date?