Regular void
Regular void
Posted Sep 11, 2026 22:51 UTC (Fri) by wahern (subscriber, #37304)In reply to: Regular void by mb
Parent article: Stabilizing Rust's never type
Almost certainly will never happen. My impression is the committee avoids name mangling like the plague. And name mangling aside, I assume there's a host of other thorny issues regarding parameter passing (e.g. references, implicit this, etc) that nobody wants to tackle. Is there any prior art? I don't remember GCC or clang having any extensions to help calling into non-extern-C C++.
