Regular void
Regular void
Posted Sep 11, 2026 18:58 UTC (Fri) by mb (subscriber, #50428)In reply to: Regular void by wahern
Parent article: Stabilizing Rust's never type
>wanting to support some degree of source-level compatibility with C++
Not having an FFI between C++ and C is a major problem.
Having it would free C++ from many of the compatibility problems.
It is fixable by introducing it in a new standard version.
But there does not seem to be willingness to do it - I presume - as it would complicate programs that mix C and C++ willy-nilly
