|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

UI automation is necessary for accessibility

UI automation is necessary for accessibility

Posted Jul 13, 2026 11:04 UTC (Mon) by paulj (subscriber, #341)
In reply to: UI automation is necessary for accessibility by farnz
Parent article: An update on the scraper situation

Perfect is the enemy of good enough perhaps.

There are distributed payment systems in fairly wide use today, 1 in particular which is viable for micro-payments down to about a ยข. They just don't do recovery. So the answer to "but recovery is hard" quite possibly is that you can not solve it and the resulting system may still be adequate for use - if not as perfect as you'd advocate for.

Indeed, a number of people would argue that some centralised 'recovery' authority able to reverse transactions at a network level would be a *malfeature* in any distributed, online, (micro)-payments system. Non-reversability (at a network level), they would argue to be an essential feature (and this would *not* preclude availing of legal action to recover funds).


The LWN site is currently under high scraper load, so comment display has been suppressed for anonymous users. If you are a human, you may read the comments by clicking the button below:

Note: you can avoid this step in the future by logging into your LWN account.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds