|From:||Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>|
|To:||Bill Huey <bhuey-AT-lnxw.com>|
|Subject:||Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U8|
|Date:||Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:00:06 +0200|
|Cc:||Jens Axboe <axboe-AT-suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc-AT-rncbc.org>, LKML <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>, Lee Revell <rlrevell-AT-joe-job.com>, mark_h_johnson-AT-raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" <kr-AT-cybsft.com>, Adam Heath <doogie-AT-debian.org>, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas-AT-gmx.net>, Michal Schmidt <xschmi00-AT-stud.feec.vutbr.cz>, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando-AT-ccrma.stanford.edu>|
* Bill Huey <email@example.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 08:19:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > It has to go, why? Because your deadlock detection breaks? Doesn't seem > > a very strong reason to me at all, sorry. > > The deadlock detector is needed. Whether you understand that or not is > irrelevant to the current work that's being done. And your idiot > attacks against it doesn't correct these issues nor does it gain > credibility with the audience that does find it useful. oh no! /me watches the flames fan out again as a bushfire do you expect there to be any meaningful technical discussion resulting out of you calling Jens' (valid) comments 'idiot attacks'? Fact is, upstream couldnt care less about PREEMPT_REALTIME and/or the deadlock detector at this point. Upstream _never_ cared about any not yet merged (and in this case, completely unfinished) feature. /me apologizes to Jens Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Copyright © 2004, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds