|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Fedora Council proposes pausing Community Initiatives

Aoife Moloney has, on behalf of the Fedora Council, posted an announcement that the Fedora Council is "proposing we pause the Community Initiatives process as an official project process" because it has decided the current process is ineffective. It is also closing discussion regarding the AI developer desktop initiative covered by LWN in May.

The Fedora Objectives/Initiatives framework was never intended as a mandatory prerequisite to do the work in Fedora. It supposed to help by focusing the community on a certain work when needed, not to decide what is allowed. The AI developer desktop initiative proposal highlighted that the Community Initiatives process has failed to serve as a good framework in Fedora where new ideas can surface, receive respectful feedback, and gain Council support for work that fits the project's present and/or future. This is something that the Council must address.

As a first step, we would like to halt the community initiative process immediately. Existing initiatives in flight (Fedora Forge, Atomic, and Fedora Docs 2026) will continue with full Council backing. Their underlying work will be completed as planned in their current timeboxed state, though the administrative framework around them may evolve. As a second step, we would like to work out a new mechanism to allow Council to set strategic direction in an open, transparent way that more intentionally includes the community voice. We recognise that we have to be better at being more open in our discussions and decision making.

The council is considering the "sandbox" proposal as an alternative or supplement to a process that replaces the Community Initiatives.



to post comments

As expected

Posted Jul 3, 2026 11:02 UTC (Fri) by khomutsky (subscriber, #130682) [Link]

Rules serve only the rulers.

Red... tape?

Posted Jul 3, 2026 21:23 UTC (Fri) by marcH (subscriber, #57642) [Link] (1 responses)

An announcement about the ineffective process to design a framework for the council to support sandbox initiatives to help discussions to create a mechanism for strategic directions to help surface community ideas. Nothing is not allowed. Or did I get the these in the wrong order?

Remind me, who recently acquired RedHat again? :-)

Ironically, I often pass for a "process & rules" person. But only when: 1. the process is obvious to most people affected (I genuinely wonder about that here); 2. the process is only a means to an end and constantly evaluated, exceptions are possible, etc. Apparently true here!

Red... tape?

Posted Jul 4, 2026 7:54 UTC (Sat) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935) [Link]

Recently? It's been seven years almost since the announcement, six since the approval.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds