|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

There's AI slop and anti-AI slop

There's AI slop and anti-AI slop

Posted May 30, 2026 19:11 UTC (Sat) by kleptog (subscriber, #1183)
In reply to: There's AI slop and anti-AI slop by dskoll
Parent article: Nesbitt: Protestware for coding agents

> When AI slop crowds out human-written books, human-written books are hard to find (I bet most people use Amazon to discover new books, and when they see 20 AI books to 1 human book, it makes human books much less discoverable.) And so humans end up losing money

I guess the real question is: when you buy a book, are you looking for a good read, or are you looking for a good read written by a human?

There's a lot of crap being written by humans too. There aren't that many great books, a lot are just mediocre. So what is the end game here? Perhaps I can read books specifically written for me that noone else will ever read. Is this a bad thing? That for the rest of my life I only read for me great books.

In any case, humans aren't losing money: AI isn't being paid. The money you spend is still going to a human, just different ones.


to post comments

There's AI slop and anti-AI slop

Posted May 31, 2026 11:47 UTC (Sun) by DOT (subscriber, #58786) [Link]

At the moment, AI is severely unprofitable. Our pensions are paying for it through the stock market. When the correction comes, it won't be pretty for the people on the low end of the economic ladder.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds