Is that not the LLM guy?
Is that not the LLM guy?
Posted May 11, 2026 14:49 UTC (Mon) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)In reply to: Is that not the LLM guy? by mirabilos
Parent article: killswitch for short-term emergency vulnerability mitigation
> * All code must be compatible with GPL-2.0-only
>> … which clearly excludes LLM-regurgitated slop.
Does it? I understand you wish it was so but so far there hasn't been any clear rulings that have indicated that. If anything it looks like the opposite situation in practice. Refer to https://lwn.net/Articles/1061534/