|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

RE: Users

RE: Users

Posted Apr 24, 2026 4:13 UTC (Fri) by notriddle (subscriber, #130608)
In reply to: Fast upgrades by ju3Ceemi
Parent article: Dependency-cooldown discussions warm up

If by "users", you mean "application end-users", then that's the worst possible place to put this responsibility.

Application users outnumber developers, so if every user made the decision on their own, then the total person-hours put into the decision making would be larger than if the responsibility defaulted [1] to developers, even though most users are doing the same, redundant, work.

Developers also outnumber registry operators, so implementing a policy within the package registry requires even less person-hours than expecting every developer to do it.

[1]: with an option for end users to patch the application and take responsibility into their own hands, assuming a perfect world where all applications are Free software


to post comments

RE: Users

Posted Apr 24, 2026 10:01 UTC (Fri) by taladar (subscriber, #68407) [Link]

Obviously the users would delegate those decisions to whoever writes the default configs for their system (e.g. distro maintainers or the maintainers of their packaging tool) but the point is that it would be easier if the user side introduced the delay if they want to.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds