I can't help but feeling like if we're just going to be talking about copyright, we've jumped the shark.
I can't help but feeling like if we're just going to be talking about copyright, we've jumped the shark.
Posted Apr 15, 2026 13:39 UTC (Wed) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: I can't help but feeling like if we're just going to be talking about copyright, we've jumped the shark. by QxDEADBEEF
Parent article: Vibe-coded ext4 for OpenBSD
It's difficult to find good software productivity metrics. One metric we heard a lot - hopefully less often now[*] - is: number of new lines of code per day. I hope this was a "streetlight effect": looking at that particular metric because it's a simple metric despite it measuring the "wrong" thing. Yet I heard it from many managers and even from some "respected" developers... :-(
Using AI to automate refactorings or to find bugs sounds great, I'm all for it. Throw-away prototypes and some other uses are fine too. But every experienced software developer should cringe when hearing "Look at how many lines of code I can write per day!". It does not matter whether all this new code is reviewed by humans or AI or both: duplication is a massive waste, period.
[*] Claude Mythos seems to be affecting the focus and news cycle right now. Great.
