|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Neat

Neat

Posted Apr 2, 2026 23:34 UTC (Thu) by calvinowens (subscriber, #100757)
Parent article: The role of LLMs in patch review

My first experience with it was positive, it correctly identified an obvious nesting case I should have caught. It proposed some confusing solutions which I allowed to confuse me, but that's my fault. I've only just started using these tools for review: it has taken some practice, but I feel like I'm quickly getting better at that.

To put a positive spin on it, forcing myself to reject the false positives has frequently been a productive learning exercise for me. But I can certainly understand why somebody under time pressure to finish something could see that as a strict negative.


to post comments

Neat

Posted Apr 4, 2026 6:51 UTC (Sat) by tsoni.lwn (subscriber, #139617) [Link]

Qualcomm had a PatchWise tool released much before Sashiko and it did provide facility to plugin any model and not just that you can run many static checkers too. It just that it didn’t had free service of reviews like Sashiko. I prefer running Ollama with it instead. It should be easy to write a dashboard and running it with free model?

https://github.com/qualcomm/PatchWise


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds