|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

git rebase / history rewrite

git rebase / history rewrite

Posted Feb 16, 2026 13:30 UTC (Mon) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
In reply to: git rebase / history rewrite by taladar
Parent article: Evolving Git for the next decade

> which "seems" heuristic and unreliable

You also know a new tool is great when the people who like it are the ones actually using it, while the people who don't like it are the ones who haven't tried it :-)

- I don't know the exact "distance" but the changes have to be pretty close to older changes, otherwise jj absorb does not touch them. I found it pretty conservative in practice.
- This is not a command to use all the time, it's meant to be run on fixups. But it saves a tremendous amount of time in some specific phases, like for instance when addressing small review comments.
- Unlike git, jj has a very reliable "jj undo" command. Then you can switch to "jj squash [-i] ... filename" each file/diff/hunk individually in cases "jj absorb" did not do what you wanted. "jj squash" is still more convenient and faster than with git. Also, "jj undo" is not even needed when the distance was too big.

tl;dr: jj absorb is amazing.

Don't try jj if by some miracle you never experienced much frustration with git. But don't listen to the people who haven't tried it either; just ignore them.


to post comments

git rebase / history rewrite

Posted Feb 17, 2026 9:49 UTC (Tue) by taladar (subscriber, #68407) [Link]

Can't say I have ever felt much frustration with git related to working on multiple branches merged together at the same time and having trouble associating fixups with their respective changes.

Never really got the UI frustrations people claim around git in general to be honest, are some of the parameters and sub commands a bit badly named, sure. But the overall workflow is solid and works on a simple data structure that I can easily wrap my head around.

I honestly wouldn't even know where to begin trying jj in such a way that it would show off something it can do better without completely revamping the way I think about source control to that extremely weird jj model of working on multiple branches at the same time in the same work tree.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds