|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

COW and volume management?

COW and volume management?

Posted Jan 28, 2026 8:33 UTC (Wed) by taladar (subscriber, #68407)
In reply to: COW and volume management? by marcH
Parent article: Filesystem medley: EROFS, NTFS, and XFS

I did actually try it once for a little while in the early days when the hype was at its peak. From what i remember the ZFS design had some issues around requiring huge amounts of kernel memory which presented a big problem for alternate implementations even on license compatible systems like the BSDs and it quickly ran out of memory on systems with the 2GB of RAM that were still common at the time. Overall I was not very impressed, especially since 90% of its supposed advantages are meaningless on the small scale of just 2-4 disks or so that you might have in a typical home system.


to post comments

COW and volume management?

Posted Feb 5, 2026 17:27 UTC (Thu) by georgh-cat (guest, #158897) [Link]

Is that memory issue something you experimented yourself?

I had a 750GB mirror running on OpenSolaris at home on 2008 (still using ZFS today and that pool was migrated once to 4TB disks), and I was afraid of the memory thing.

It was never an issue. Even when approaching full disk capacity, never had the memory usage be anywhere near high or even a potential problem. Then had the same server migrated to FreeBSD (OpenSolaris not being maintained anymore) and same experience.

If there ever were memory issues, I was somehow not affected or it was a myth or misunderstanding of how it worked.


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds