communication

Posted Jan 25, 2026 17:04 UTC (Sun) by SLi (subscriber, #53131)
In reply to: communication by wtarreau
Parent article: Responses to gpg.fail

> There can be plenty of reasons to criticize the gpg tool for being overly complicated to use, almost unusable in scripts not running in a tty, or for spawning an agent daemon even when you don't want one in recent versions, but this might just not be the right tool for certain tasks.

Would you allow that there might some some responsibility for a developer of a major security tool that gains significant "not right tool" uses to be more vocal about it not being the right tool?