portable APT?
portable APT?
Posted Nov 26, 2025 14:01 UTC (Wed) by ATLief (subscriber, #166135)In reply to: portable APT? by jmm
Parent article: APT Rust requirement raises questions
The apt package is marked as "Essential: yes" and "Priority: required", so anything officially supported would need to include it. I guess those designations could be removed, but their intention is probably to ensure that packages can be installed on any system. I think having multiple lowest common denominators (like apt on most systems and cupt on others) would defeat the purpose of marking them as such.
