It's hard for me to see (from the information in the article) why KDE e.V.is relevant enough to anything for people to be concerned about how it operates.
In particular, I don't see how KDE e.V. can control a trademark that was in use by others before KDE e.V. existed. Did someone with rights to the name transfer them?
Copyright © 2017, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds