|
|
Log in / Subscribe / Register

Agree on the reproducibility aspect, but not on the static medium of PDF

Agree on the reproducibility aspect, but not on the static medium of PDF

Posted Jun 9, 2025 19:04 UTC (Mon) by fraetor (subscriber, #161147)
In reply to: Agree on the reproducibility aspect, but not on the static medium of PDF by rsidd
Parent article: The importance of free software to science

The big issue with notebooks is reproducability; I often have difficulty getting a notebook running that we written by a colleague at the same organisation a few months ago.

Given their expanded capabilities, notebooks are inherently going to be harder to reproduce in their orignal fidelity than a PDF, which is fully described by a self-contained specification, though how one is meant to read a specification distributed as a PDF leads to other questions. Being open makes reproduction possible, but it is still a significant hurdle.

I think static documents such as PDF still has a role to play, even if it is just a medium to determine one's interest in some work before investigating the code.

The web is an interesting publishing medium, forming a sort of middle ground between static PDFs and the fully dynamic notebook. I see more journals embracing it as a distribution mechanism; some even allow for interactive plots powered by JavaScript. So perhaps that will be the future direction.


to post comments


Copyright © 2026, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds