Agree on the reproducibility aspect, but not on the static medium of PDF
Agree on the reproducibility aspect, but not on the static medium of PDF
Posted Jun 8, 2025 5:09 UTC (Sun) by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)Parent article: The importance of free software to science
Here's a good blog post (from 2018) by Nobel-winning economist Paul Romer, on "Jupyter, Mathematica and the future of the research paper". He makes many of the same points about open science and reproducibility, and not being locked down to a proprietary system. But much more.
The main point is, in 2018 and even more in 2025, a static PDF is a very limited way of communicating science. We can do much better.
A Jupyter notebook is a significant game-changer here. Though it is not accepted as a medium of publication by journals, there is a lot of useful supplementary data out there in such formats. And it is of course important that it is not proprietary, unlike Mathematica. But its dynamic nature is also important.
