2 packagers but 3 packages?
2 packagers but 3 packages?
Posted Mar 5, 2025 0:24 UTC (Wed) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: 2 packagers but 3 packages? by pizza
Parent article: Fedora discusses Flatpak priorities
> > OK, so if Flatpaks are generally better then: do not offer the corresponding RPM available when a tested Flatpak is already offered.
> IIUC Fedora flatpaks are always built _from_ the RPMs.
So?
Does that mean the flatpak can only be safer hence better? Then hide the corresponding RPM.
In practice, some unexpected things always go wrong and I bet some flatpaks can fall... flat. Couldn't resist, sorry. Then, hide that particular flatpak from non-developers.
In any case some level of per-package flexibility is required.