http://lwn.net/Articles/99279/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "KDE and FreeDesktop.org". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/99822/rss 2004-08-28T21:41:31+00:00 daniels Actually, I proposed that the current systemtray spec be included in the <br> fd.o platform, and it was vetoed on the basis that a new one should be <br> developed which was less painful. <br> http://lwn.net/Articles/99385/rss 2004-08-26T12:17:13+00:00 zooko <p>The part about looking at a CVS replacement motivated me to update my <a href="http://zooko.com/revision_control_quick_ref.html">http://zooko.com/revision_control_quick_ref.html</a> document. http://lwn.net/Articles/99349/rss 2004-08-26T10:13:04+00:00 harisri The sentence "Starting to migrate the internal messaging system from DCOP <br> to DBUS and adapting KDE libraries and applications to take advantage of <br> HAL will lie underneath the are both hot topics." is wrong. I think the <br> "the" in "... lie underneath the ..." is not needed. <br> <br> Thanks <br> http://lwn.net/Articles/99337/rss 2004-08-26T07:42:29+00:00 telex4 They dropped a proposed new systray spec, and it was vetoed. The old one <br> remains. <br> http://lwn.net/Articles/99324/rss 2004-08-26T04:24:24+00:00 rfunk What's this about dropping the systray specification? Why did they do <br> this? <br> <br> I like the fact that I can run a Gtk app and have its systray icon show <br> up on my KDE panel. I have one there now. (Only problem is that the <br> icon will occasionally disappear mysteriously and I have to toggle it in <br> the app settings to get it back.) <br>