LWN: Comments on "The 3.17 kernel is out" https://lwn.net/Articles/615010/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The 3.17 kernel is out". en-us Thu, 18 Sep 2025 02:07:38 +0000 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 02:07:38 +0000 https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification lwn@lwn.net Broken libata blacklist in 3.17, fixed in 3.17.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/616228/ https://lwn.net/Articles/616228/ hmh <div class="FormattedComment"> Fortunately, there was enough time for it to be late-added to 3.17.1, so kernel 3.17.1 fixes the issue.<br> </div> Wed, 15 Oct 2014 10:59:39 +0000 Broken libata blacklist in 3.17 AND 3.17.1 https://lwn.net/Articles/615978/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615978/ hmh <div class="FormattedComment"> The fix is unlikely to be in 3.17.1. Beware.<br> </div> Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:05:00 +0000 Broken libata blacklist in 3.17 https://lwn.net/Articles/615398/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615398/ NightMonkey <div class="FormattedComment"> I just never use a .0 kernel release. If I'm impatient, I'll go with .1, and if not, wait for .2 and beyond. :)<br> </div> Wed, 08 Oct 2014 21:58:04 +0000 Broken libata blacklist in 3.17 https://lwn.net/Articles/615254/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615254/ hmh <div class="FormattedComment"> please apply:<br> <a href="http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg49669.html">http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg49669.html</a><br> <p> Or wait for 3.17.1 before you try the shiny new kernel if any of your devices need the libata blacklist...<br> <p> For example, owners of Micron/Crucial MX500 and MX550 SSDs must _not_ use kernel 3.17 without the above fix, on pain of data loss:<br> <a href="https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71371">https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71371</a><br> </div> Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:40:07 +0000 The 3.17 kernel is out https://lwn.net/Articles/615091/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615091/ SEJeff <div class="FormattedComment"> Perhaps you could reproduce it in a QEMU based VM (some of the issues at least)?<br> </div> Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:37:50 +0000 The 3.17 kernel is out https://lwn.net/Articles/615083/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615083/ deater <div class="FormattedComment"> The perf_event interface is fragile when it comes to fuzzing, especially with respect to race conditions across forks.<br> <p> This has been a known issue for a while, and there were some last minute patches that made it into 3.17 final that seem to have improved things slightly.<br> <p> However there are still various crashing bugs, and they don't seem to be deemed important enough to hold up a release, especially since they aren't technically regressions.<br> <p> Part of the problem is that it's nearly impossible to make small reproducible testcases for these issues; it doesn't help that perf_event event support varies widely among processors so a simple fuzzer random seed isn't enough to reproduce an issue unless the other side has identical hardware.<br> <p> </div> Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:38:04 +0000 The 3.17 kernel is out https://lwn.net/Articles/615074/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615074/ rriggs <div class="FormattedComment"> Does posting this information to KML before the official release announcement goes out help at all?<br> </div> Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:36:03 +0000 The 3.17 kernel is out https://lwn.net/Articles/615049/ https://lwn.net/Articles/615049/ deater <div class="FormattedComment"> Yet another kernel release that's trivial to lock up completely by running the perf_fuzzer for a little bit.<br> <p> I wish it were easier to track down low-level bugs like this.<br> <p> <p> </div> Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:32:12 +0000