http://lwn.net/Articles/544522/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "PyCon: Asynchronous I/O". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/545469/rss 2013-04-01T19:52:38+00:00 talex <div class="FormattedComment"> I recently added (experimental) Tulip support to 0install (it uses it if the glib Python bindings aren't available). The conversion from glib to tulip was straight-forward and, although the code was designed for glib, it was actually cleaner after conversion, IMHO:<br> <p> <a href="https://github.com/0install/0install/commit/2b13b69ace187d46746058679a347ca63b3e172f">https://github.com/0install/0install/commit/2b13b69ace187...</a><br> <p> (the patch also adds a compatibility wrapper to make glib look like tulip, but it only implements the minimal functionality that I needed)<br> <p> This should be a big win for the Windows port, which currently has to bundle the whole glib/gobject/gi stack just for the event loop.<br> </div> http://lwn.net/Articles/545011/rss 2013-03-28T18:36:14+00:00 smitty_one_each <div class="FormattedComment"> <font class="QuotedText">&gt;a reference implementation called Tulip</font><br> <p> And thus Guido stands revealed as a Calvinist! ;-)<br> </div> http://lwn.net/Articles/544881/rss 2013-03-28T12:35:26+00:00 pj <div class="FormattedComment"> I'm glad to hear that python will finally standardize on an async core, ahd it sounds like on some standard usage patterns. ayay!<br> </div>