<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/331154/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "SchoolTool 1.0 released"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331154/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;SchoolTool 1.0 released&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/332705/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331427/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331279/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331232/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331229/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331200/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331186/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/331185/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/332705/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/332705/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-10T18:48:44+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>oak</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
&lt;font class=&quot;QuotedText&quot;&gt;&amp;gt; tool is primararily a derogatory term for overachievers, bookworms, what &lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
have you. It suggests a certain social nonfunctionality to working hard.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Well, doesn't the name then fit the program well?  Programs definitely &lt;br&gt;
should be hard-working and on human scale computers are pretty &lt;br&gt;
antisocial...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331427/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331427/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-03T19:56:12+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>MattPerry</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
&lt;font class=&quot;QuotedText&quot;&gt;&amp;gt; Of course, schoolchildren are prone to prefer the slang definitions of words&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
School children aren't the intended audience for this software. They likely will never know it exists. I had never heard of the slang definition and I thought that SchoolTool was a descriptive and fitting name.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331279/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331279/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-02T02:24:48+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>k8to</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
In the american scholastic context, tool is primararily a derogatory term for overachievers, bookworms, what have you.  It suggests a certain social nonfunctionality to working hard.  The word is sometimes knowingly self-applied or used as a verb.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Really, tool as insult is more common in many scholastic environments than tool in the sense of &quot;power tools&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That said, I think the name doesn't matter that much. It's for teachers, not students.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331232/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331232/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-01T21:10:57+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>amk</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
Sure, there's a slang meaning, but people also use the word 'tool' in its usual sense all the time.  &quot;Unix Power Tools&quot;.  &quot;Unix Backup Tool&quot;.  Kernighan &amp;amp; Plauger's classic book &quot;Software Tools&quot; (not a rollicking satire of software development).  SchoolTool seems an unobjectionable choice for a name.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331229/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331229/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-01T21:01:07+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>clugstj</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
I quoted the dictionary because it was nearby.  The connotation of the word &quot;tool&quot; in the name struck me before that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331200/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331200/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-01T18:50:45+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>jspaleta</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It looks like SchoolTool has been working on supporting the SIF specification for interoperability with other applications so thats a very good thing to see. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sifinfo.org/us/index.asp&quot;&gt;http://www.sifinfo.org/us/index.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But its not clear how far along that SIF support is. Hopefully Schooltool can be SIF certified sooner rather than later.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-jef&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331186/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331186/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-01T17:27:12+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>pboddie</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
Because the first dictionary everyone turns to is the &quot;New Dictionary of American Slang&quot;? There are other dictionaries, you know.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
(Of course, schoolchildren are prone to prefer the slang definitions of words, but one would imagine that the desired connotations would have something to do with the popular 1990s term &quot;cool tool&quot;.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/331185/rss">
      <title>SchoolTool 1.0 released</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/331185/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2009-05-01T17:18:02+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>clugstj</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
Who came up with this name?  Some &quot;tool&quot; no doubt.  According to the &quot;New Dictionary of American Slang&quot; (c. 1986), the first three definitions are: 1) the penis, 2) a pickpocket, 3) a stupid and gullible person.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

