<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/299490/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/299490/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300837/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300835/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300394/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300384/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300377/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300376/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300364/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/300334/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300837/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300837/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-28T20:25:55+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>nix</dc:creator>
      <description>
      If you look at it right, it already does. :)
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300835/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300835/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-28T18:38:31+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Oddscurity</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;blockquote&gt;The Common Unix Printing System (CUPS) is a service that makes sense to start &quot;30 seconds before the user thinks of clicking on the print button,&quot; he said.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Upstart will feature precognition? Now &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is impressive.
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300394/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300394/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T14:37:12+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>ballombe</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
... and to add to the confusion, Scott is a Debian developer (and so is Miquel van Smoorenburg).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300384/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300384/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T11:08:19+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>pdewacht</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
Debian, and I guess Ubuntu too, by default setup runlevels 2--5 to be identical, because there's no agreement on how they should differ. If you want different stuff in different runlevels, you'll have to configure it yourself.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300377/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300377/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T10:05:33+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>rahulsundaram</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
This works just fine in Fedora 9. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300376/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300376/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T10:00:39+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>melo@simplicidade.org</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
A lot of what upstart is doing is similar to what Darwin launchd does.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I wonder if there isn't good ideas to be taken from launchd. I personally use the directory watchers &lt;br&gt;
with great results.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Best regards,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300364/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300364/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T07:33:50+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>aleXXX</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
Not sure about the current state: in kUbuntu 7.10 upstart doesn't support &lt;br&gt;
some relatively basic init feature, I think it was the different run &lt;br&gt;
levels, i.e. I think I was not able to get different stuff running e.g. &lt;br&gt;
for runlevels 3 and 4 or so.&lt;br&gt;
Will this be supported in 1.0 ?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Alex&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/300334/rss">
      <title>LPC: Upstart 1.0 plans: manifesto for a new init</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/300334/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T02:22:34+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>rahulsundaram</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;
&quot;Upstart is in Fedora as of version 9, making it a welcome example of a Canonical-sponsored project finding its way into other distributions.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last I heard, Upstart is being developed by Scott is his own time and this was apparently confirmed by him earlier on. Nevertheless the software itself is a useful contribution. Distributions that currently use it are still using the old init scripts under compatibility mode and haven't migrated to new upstart style scripts yet which is probably the important step. We won't see any advantages till then. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

