http://lwn.net/Articles/298587/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The 2008 Linux Kernel Summit". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/298945/rss 2008-09-18T03:39:01+00:00 jgsack@san.rr.com <div class="FormattedComment"> Just want to thank you for the effort that must have gone into this section and all the subsections. It gives a nice flavor of the meeting.<br> <p> ..jim<br> </div> http://lwn.net/Articles/298639/rss 2008-09-16T15:07:32+00:00 martinfick <div class="FormattedComment"> I +++ that idea.<br> </div> http://lwn.net/Articles/298609/rss 2008-09-16T11:00:38+00:00 dberkholz "nash" stands for "not a shell." You can't actually write standard shell syntax for your initrd's linuxrc -- it's got lots of missing and extra features. <a href="http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/linuxcommand.org/man_pages/nash8.html">Here's a copy of the nash man page</a>. Something like a shell but not quite a shell is just confusing. http://lwn.net/Articles/298605/rss 2008-09-16T09:36:30+00:00 michaeljt <div class="FormattedComment"> A request to the editor - would it be possible to make the comments on the article subsections accessible from the front page?<br> </div> http://lwn.net/Articles/298603/rss 2008-09-16T09:19:05+00:00 error27 <div class="FormattedComment"> What are the evils of nash?<br> <p> I certainly prefer it to fedora's initrd. There a few times when I've had to stick a statically compiled bash shell into a fedora installer initrd to debug it. Grumble.<br> <p> <p> </div>