<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/280438/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "Distributions in the Summer of Code"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/280438/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;Distributions in the Summer of Code&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/283799/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/280809/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/280782/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/280774/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/280570/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/283799/rss">
      <title>Distributions in the Summer of Code</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/283799/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-05-26T18:37:38+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>muwlgr</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
Better teach GRUB or LILO to boot the kernel from LVM partitions.
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/280809/rss">
      <title>Distributions in the Summer of Code</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/280809/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-05-02T16:09:24+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>dberkholz</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
I relied on using names I recognized by eye when scanning through the list on the Summer of
Code site. Unfortunately, both my eyes and my knowledge of distros are fallible -- sorry about
that. I probably also missed any other distros besides Pardus that don't show up in the top 50
at DistroWatch.

Of Pardus' five slots, the split looks like this:

-Package management: 2
-Configuration management: 1
-Installation: 1
-And the project to add 802.1x to NetworkManager

Another &quot;distribution&quot; worth mentioning is MacPorts, which has four projects all related to
package management. I didn't mention Haiku because all its projects were OS-related, so it
wasn't interesting for the purposes of this article.
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/280782/rss">
      <title>Distributions in the Summer of Code</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/280782/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-05-02T10:00:31+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>caglar</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
Seems like our editor have not done his homework right :(, how can you miss &quot;Pardus Project&quot;
[1] with five [1] slots...

[1] &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng/index.html&quot;&gt;http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng/index.html&lt;/a&gt;
[2] &lt;a href=&quot;http://code.google.com/soc/2008/pardus/about.html&quot;&gt;http://code.google.com/soc/2008/pardus/about.html&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/280774/rss">
      <title>Distributions in the Summer of Code</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/280774/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-05-02T08:01:01+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>afalko</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
I think that package management systems are 
1) Not perfect (at least I haven't run across one that is perfect).
2) The most important part of a distribution.

Right now, GSoC package management system proposal seem to fit into one of the following
categories:
1) Infrastructure to improve how developers maintain packages.
2) Usability improvements.
3) Clean up or introduction of a feature.

There are exceptions, such as a proposal to convert packaging formats.
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/280570/rss">
      <title>Distributions in the Summer of Code</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/280570/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2008-05-01T06:02:06+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>dirtyepic</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
i was surprised at first to see the sheer number of package management projects people are
working on.  i guess it makes sense though;  package management is one of if not /the/ most
important elements of a distribution, and each distro has their own method of handling
packages which in turn have their own unique problems, needs, and goals.

it seems we still have a long way to go in this department.  luckily, it also seems we have
plenty of ideas on how we're going to get there.
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

