<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/263293/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "Building A Linux Music Studio (LinuxPlanet)"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/263293/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;Building A Linux Music Studio (LinuxPlanet)&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/263365/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/263330/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/263308/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/263365/rss">
      <title>Building A Linux Music Studio (LinuxPlanet)</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/263365/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-12-29T10:03:09+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>BackSeat</dc:creator>
      <description>
      +1
&lt;p&gt;
This isn't about building a music studio: it's essentially a plug for one product. LWN, don't descend to the level of Linux Journal, please.
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/263330/rss">
      <title>Building A Linux Music Studio (LinuxPlanet)</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/263330/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-12-28T20:38:40+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>pkern</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
Uh, I don't see in which way this article should help to build a music studio.  I would have
expected a comparision of multi trackers instead.  I dislike seeing LWN to become a generic
link farm featuring &quot;tutorials&quot;.
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/263308/rss">
      <title>Building A Linux Music Studio (LinuxPlanet)</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/263308/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-12-28T17:56:06+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>tseaver</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;div class=&quot;FormattedComment&quot;&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
I'll second the author's recommendation of the Handy Zoom2 recorder:
I have never seen anything better for doing dirt-simple, high-fidelity
field recording.  I know musicians who record all their gigs with the
device, which is small enough to fit in a shirt pocket, and have been
blown away by the quality of the recording.

For example, this track was made with the Zoom2 sitting on the floor
in the middle of a rehearsal including full horn and rhythm sections;
it captured an amazingly faithful (and useful) live track:

  &lt;a href=&quot;http://palladion.com/static/Dragonsbane-Well_You_Neednt-20071027.mp3&quot;&gt;http://palladion.com/static/Dragonsbane-Well_You_Neednt-2...&lt;/a&gt;

For extra bonus points, the device Just Works(TM) with Linux.
When plugged in over USB (it is bus powered!), it functions as either
a USB disk, allowing you to retrieve the field recordings, or as an ALSA
soundcard using the onboard mikes and line out.

One quibble with the article:  I didn't find it necessary to go through
the SOX conversion dance:  Audacity was happy to read the raw WAV files
directly, after copying to the hard-drive (the USB interface is too
slow to work directly from the recorder for large files).

&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

