<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/233315/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "More stuff for 2.6.22"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233315/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;More stuff for 2.6.22&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/234114/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/234113/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/234029/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/233880/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/233741/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/233730/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/233695/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/233694/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/234114/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/234114/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-12T22:42:00+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>xma</dc:creator>
      <description>
      I think suspend to ram/disk separation is a good news and I hope it'll &lt;br&gt;
help to have reliable solutions for the s2d part.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/234113/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/234113/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-12T22:40:05+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>xma</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Will ipw2100 and ipw2200 transit to this new WiFi stack ?&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/234029/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/234029/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-11T20:14:34+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>BradReed</dc:creator>
      <description>
      yep, the newer iwlwifi driver for the ipw3945 and ipw4965 is using it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/233880/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233880/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-11T01:16:03+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>drag</dc:creator>
      <description>
      That's great. It would be terrific if Linux wireless woes are effectively solved with this and future driver development can be much easier then it's traditionally been....&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/233741/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233741/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-10T11:05:12+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>tajyrink</dc:creator>
      <description>
      There's also zd1211rw that has been moving to devicescape, and adm8211, rtl818x and apparently ipw3945.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/233730/rss">
      <title>More stuff for 2.6.22</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233730/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-10T09:37:17+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>drag</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Go devicescape stack! er.. mac80211&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I know that at least one driver needs it.. the Ralink rt2x00 drivers. The broadcom bcm43xx driver can use it also.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Other drivers could probably benifit from it also. Make them smaller, faster, and support more advanced features.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
So how was the userspace stuff resolved with Mac80211? Just through wpa_supplicant or something?&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/233695/rss">
      <title>-ffunction-sections</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233695/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-10T04:34:54+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>dirtyepic</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Of course I stumble across it two seconds later..&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/517493/focus=517612&quot;&gt;http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/517493/focus=5...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/233694/rss">
      <title>-ffunction-sections</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/233694/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2007-05-10T04:31:42+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>dirtyepic</dc:creator>
      <description>
      I can't seem to find the commit where -ffunction-sections (ie. function reordering) was removed for x86_64.  Does anyone know offhand the reason it was punted?&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

