LWN: Comments on "Beryl and Compiz: back together again?"
http://lwn.net/Articles/228165/
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled "Beryl and Compiz: back together again?".
hourly2Pick best-known of the two names
http://lwn.net/Articles/228870/rss
2007-04-02T20:56:15+00:00bronson
Why would you want to use brand names for the subcomponents of a project? That would be like calling kernel/drivers "Alchemy," or /usr/share/doc "Brontosaurus." Yes, they're much more trademarkable, but does that really help anything?<br>
<p>
Pick best-known of the two names
http://lwn.net/Articles/228862/rss
2007-04-02T19:36:18+00:00holstein
The words "core" or "plugins" could be found hard to defend as brand names.<br>
Pick best-known of the two names
http://lwn.net/Articles/228752/rss
2007-03-31T17:18:54+00:00bronson
Why not call the core "core" and the plugins "plugins"?<br>
<p>
That just sounds like needless jargon to me.<br>
Pick best-known of the two names
http://lwn.net/Articles/228724/rss
2007-03-31T09:54:06+00:00erwbgy
Really? I hadn't heard of Beryl until I read this article, but I had <br>
heard of Compiz.<br>
<p>
Calling the core Compiz and the plugins Beryl, as suggested above, sounds <br>
sensible to me.<br>
Beryl and Compiz: back together again?
http://lwn.net/Articles/228489/rss
2007-03-29T20:23:53+00:00Hawke
If you had read the article linked to by the vandalism text, you'd have seen that the person in question publicly apologized and stepped down as a forum admin.<br>
Pick best-known of the two names
http://lwn.net/Articles/228393/rss
2007-03-29T14:37:45+00:00dank
At the moment, Beryl is much better known. The<br>
main project should switch its name to Beryl to capture<br>
the better brand awareness.<br>
<p>
<p>
Beryl and Compiz: back together again?
http://lwn.net/Articles/228308/rss
2007-03-29T08:53:30+00:00PhilHannent
[Disclaimer] I have no affiliation with any of these groups.<br>
<p>
Personally I think they should stick with Compiz. The reason being that time and money probably has already been spent with lawyers and trademark people to ensure the name is ok to use for the project. Picking a new name surely would require more cost which would take money away from where its needed.<br>
<p>
Project naming
http://lwn.net/Articles/228307/rss
2007-03-29T08:44:32+00:00alonso
I have read somewhere that the name will be Coral....very fine.<br>
<p>
Beryl and Compiz: back together again?
http://lwn.net/Articles/228300/rss
2007-03-29T08:17:51+00:00ldo
<P>I'm assuming that the Compiz person responsible for mutilating the Beryl databases has been sacked. I can't imagine any Beryl folk agreeing to work with a team that still contains such a person.
Project naming
http://lwn.net/Articles/228279/rss
2007-03-29T05:06:30+00:00flewellyn
Precisely what I was going to suggest. "Compiz window manager with Beryl plugins" or <br>
somesuch.<br>
Project naming
http://lwn.net/Articles/228258/rss
2007-03-29T01:21:04+00:00felixfix
Use "compiz" for "-core", and "-beryl" for "-extras".<br>