<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/181558/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "A flurry of kernel security fixes"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/181558/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;A flurry of kernel security fixes&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/181806/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/181663/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/181806/rss">
      <title>A flurry of kernel security fixes</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/181806/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2006-04-28T00:26:17+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>raven667</dc:creator>
      <description>
      While it is true that it is good and healty to get these bugs fixed, I think it would be an improvement &lt;br&gt;
if this kind of scrutiny was applied when the code was checked into the source repository in the first &lt;br&gt;
place.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/181663/rss">
      <title>A flurry of kernel security fixes</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/181663/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2006-04-27T11:44:40+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>NAR</dc:creator>
      <description>
      If I understood well, at least two of the recently fixed bugs (CVE-2006-1242 and CVE-2006-1524) are present in the Linux kernel since 2.4, but I haven't found the flurry of security advisories and patches from distributors to fix these problems (except Fedora and Trustix patching their kernels for the second bug). Am I missing something? Are these bugs still in the latest kernels of the various distributions or they are not exploitable because they depend on a configuration option that is turned off in those kernels?
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;CENTER&gt;Bye,NAR&lt;/CENTER&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

