<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/145973/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "How fast should HZ be?"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/145973/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;How fast should HZ be?&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/149617/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/147501/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/147099/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/146379/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/146340/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/149617/rss">
      <title>How fast should HZ be?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/149617/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-08-29T20:22:15+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>rlrevell</dc:creator>
      <description>
      This is called a &quot;singing capacitor&quot;.  It happens because the greed of OEMs drives them to use increasingly cheap components.  Windows uses a base timer frequency of 100HZ and that's all the OEMs test with so the problem isn't apparent under that OS.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/147501/rss">
      <title>How fast should HZ be?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/147501/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-08-14T21:52:59+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>mikec</dc:creator>
      <description>
      There is another issue at work here which I have never taken the time to fully understand, but google tells me I am far from alone...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1000Hz Kernels make my laptop sound card whine!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
100Hz whine far less if at all...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I found this little gem a few years ago and various laptops I have had whine more or less with default kernels and changing this setting always seems to help.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It makes some &quot;seat of the pants&quot; sense that the frequency of interrupts when the system is &quot;idle&quot; could interact with a poorly isolated sound card and cause undesired analog results...  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the case of my current computer (dell 8600) it occurs:&lt;br&gt;
a. running under windows&lt;br&gt;
b. with the sound &quot;muted&quot; (under linux)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The system whines when idle and quiets down when busy...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I'd love to take the time to fully understand this some day, but in the mean time, I just change Hz and off I go computing quietly...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
/mike&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/147099/rss">
      <title>How fast should HZ be?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/147099/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-08-11T05:33:08+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>xorbe</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Certainly such a setup would be hand-tuned hopefully...&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/146379/rss">
      <title>How fast should HZ be?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/146379/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-08-05T09:33:50+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>tres</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Another reason to reduce the frequency is for servers with many virtual machines running since each one needs to service the interrupt and a machine with a thousand virtual machines running has to service ((1000 + 1) * Hz) timer interrupts.  That is excessive when most of the virtual machines might be idle.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/146340/rss">
      <title>How fast should HZ be?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/146340/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-08-04T21:40:24+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>jrigg</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Reducing HZ from 1000 to 100 gives around 7% power saving. That could be significant on a laptop, but presumably 250 will save less. Perhaps a simpler way of saving power would be to use less bloated software ;)&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

