<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/128915/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "GreaseMonkey: a two-edged sword"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/128915/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;GreaseMonkey: a two-edged sword&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/129965/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/129873/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/129432/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/129056/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/128976/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/128970/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/128968/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/129965/rss">
      <title>Turning off background images</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/129965/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-31T17:48:15+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>anton</dc:creator>
      <description>
      You can turn off background images in Mozilla (and probably Firefox) through&lt;br&gt;
Preferences -&amp;gt; Appearance -&amp;gt; Colors: Select &quot;Use my chosen colors...&quot;.&lt;br&gt;
The only downside I have noticed that you then don't see the IMDB photos.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/129873/rss">
      <title>Removing an edge</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/129873/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-31T09:37:31+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>alextingle</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Or just disable it completely for https:// pages.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/129432/rss">
      <title>GreaseMonkey: a two-edged sword</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/129432/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-29T09:20:02+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>csawtell</dc:creator>
      <description>
      At last, at long last, a way of removing those idiotic background images &lt;br&gt;
which make pages well neigh impossible to read. It will do that won't it? &lt;br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/129056/rss">
      <title>Removing an edge</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/129056/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-24T18:37:46+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>pm101</dc:creator>
      <description>
      I think the problem is fixable. The trick would be to install scripts with appropriate permissions. One that can modify slashdot.org should only be allowed to modify pages on slashdot.org, and not on paypal.com or bankofamerica.com. You risk having a slashdot account stolen, but not much more. Secure sites remain secure. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Skimming the web page, it looks like it already has that functionality in place, although it's not clear from the documentation whether it is secure-by-default or insecure-by-default. &lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/128976/rss">
      <title>GreaseMonkey: a two-edged sword</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/128976/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-24T07:18:29+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dom2</dc:creator>
      <description>
      &lt;p&gt;GreaseMonkey brings out the full potential for mozilla and friends to be more like Emacs.  Very easy to customize by advanced users.  I'm totally sold on the idea.

&lt;p&gt;I suspect for the most part that it will remain an &quot;advanced user&quot; thing, so we won't have to worry too much about what actually gets downloaded.  The UI could make it easier to review scripts that are already installed.  But I expect that this sort of thing will happen as development progresses.

&lt;p&gt;-Dom
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/128970/rss">
      <title>GreaseMonkey is ENORMOUSLY useful</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/128970/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-24T04:40:06+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>b7j0c</dc:creator>
      <description>
      This is an extension I have been pining for. In fact I described hypothetically the &quot;perfect extension&quot; to people months ago...a way of executing user-built javascript (or some other DOM-manipulation language) at sites or url pattersn I specify. Voila! Already I have scripts to remove Overture ads from yahoo pages. I remove the top matter crap from my.yahoo.com. I remove &quot;inside Yahoo&quot; links from Yahoo Search. Next: remove AdSense ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Many thanks for this excellent tool!&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/128968/rss">
      <title>GreaseMonkey: a two-edged sword</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/128968/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2005-03-24T04:05:11+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>flewellyn</dc:creator>
      <description>
      I was going to say something snarky about the &quot;Rewrite Paul Graham essays for better &lt;br&gt;
readability&quot;, but then I saw the actual scripts in question.  And yes, both of them do things which &lt;br&gt;
I think Graham's essays benefit from enormously: change the text width, and turn the footnotes &lt;br&gt;
into links.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I admit, at first I thought it would be some kind of textual munging.  :-)&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

