http://lwn.net/Articles/111875/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "The LWN.net 2004 Linux Timeline". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/119083/rss 2005-01-13T07:17:26+00:00 emj Debian Stable I thought that was just servers, I don't see how they would be using Ubuntu.<br> http://lwn.net/Articles/117992/rss 2005-01-06T12:02:48+00:00 randy For kicks, everyone really needs to go back and read the previous year's versions. Especially the gloom and doom for Linux quotes from some of the industry "experts". I really like the one stating that Oracle would never support Linux. :) Look back and see how far we've come!<br> <p> Great job, as usual, LWN!<br> http://lwn.net/Articles/117510/rss 2005-01-02T15:25:23+00:00 vmole <p>The truly sad part is that I've been around Debian so long that I didn't realize he was making a joke... http://lwn.net/Articles/117457/rss 2004-12-31T08:30:32+00:00 ncm I guess that would be <a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/112705/bigpage">here</a>. http://lwn.net/Articles/117444/rss 2004-12-30T18:23:36+00:00 iabervon I still think the "obvious, predictable objection to the inclusion of this utility" line is the funniest thing I heard this year.<br>