http://lwn.net/Articles/111389/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Conectiva, Mandrakesoft, Progeny, and Turbolinux form consortium". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/111561/rss 2004-11-18T10:14:23+00:00 tzafrir There is not a word about the expected license of LLC. What about Mandrake's supposed commitment to the GPL?<br> http://lwn.net/Articles/111518/rss 2004-11-18T00:30:55+00:00 crouchet Rocky: Again? But that trick never works!<br> <p> http://lwn.net/Articles/111517/rss 2004-11-18T00:21:42+00:00 danielthaler No standard is perfect. If thats its only problem, then LSB is doing fine. <br> http://lwn.net/Articles/111473/rss 2004-11-17T20:38:28+00:00 JoeBuck <p> Unfortunately LSB 2.0 is completely broken as far as C++ is concerned. http://lwn.net/Articles/111404/rss 2004-11-17T16:50:51+00:00 gduval Oh we should have thought about such comments...! More seriously: please understand that the goal here is not to promote one Linux standard like UL tried to do. LCC's goal is to promote *the* Linux standard - LSB &amp; its extensions - by maintaining an implementation of this standard, and work on interoperability, for instance by solving package management issues due to differences between DEB &amp; RPM (for instance).<br> http://lwn.net/Articles/111401/rss 2004-11-17T15:26:03+00:00 jensend UnitedLinux Lite: now with 75% less backstabbing!<br>