<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/108283/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "Debian Weekly News - October 26th, 2004"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108283/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;Debian Weekly News - October 26th, 2004&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/108694/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/108506/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/108439/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/108385/rss" />
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/108379/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/108694/rss">
      <title>Sarge anyone?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108694/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-28T11:46:36+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>climent</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Componetized Debian rings a bell?&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/108506/rss">
      <title>Sarge anyone?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108506/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-27T17:12:54+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>tjc</dc:creator>
      <description>
      It might work well if Debian just forgot about the desktop side of their stable release and let Ubuntu, UserLinux, Progeny, etc. take care of that.  I know a lot of people using Debian stable on servers, but as a desktop system it's just to out of date for most people.  Targeting Debian stable as a server OS on a single disc would really speed up the release process.
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/108439/rss">
      <title>Sarge anyone?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108439/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-27T13:35:15+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>joib</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Q: Why all the excitement about Ubuntu?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A: Debian, but with a predictable release date?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
;-)&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/108385/rss">
      <title>Sarge anyone?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108385/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-27T08:58:36+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>angdraug</dc:creator>
      <description>
      It didn't change since the last time: as soon as it is ready, and sooner if you help out.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/108379/rss">
      <title>Sarge anyone?</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/108379/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-27T07:43:36+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>philips</dc:creator>
      <description>
      Does any one watching Debian MLs know what is current expected release date for Sarge?&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

