<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF 
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

  <channel rdf:about="http://lwn.net/headlines/106434/">
    <title>LWN: Comments on "The Nvu Web Authoring System"</title>
    <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/106434/</link>
    <description>
This is a special feed containing comments posted
to the individual LWN article titled &quot;The Nvu Web Authoring System&quot;.

    </description>

    <syn:updatePeriod>hourly</syn:updatePeriod>
    <syn:updateFrequency>2</syn:updateFrequency>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	<rdf:li resource="http://lwn.net/Articles/106688/rss" />
      
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>

  </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://lwn.net/Articles/106688/rss">
      <title>The Nvu Web Authoring System</title>
      <link>http://lwn.net/Articles/106688/rss</link>
      <dc:date>2004-10-15T11:24:47+00:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>pivot</dc:creator>
      <description>
      I would think that in these days it would be important to have a webdav site manager in addition to an ftp based site manager. Surely a lot of old sites uses ftp, but no modern cms uses ftp, and the power of nvu is probably highest when combined with a proper cms setup.&lt;br&gt;
      
      </description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>

