http://lwn.net/Articles/10465/ This is a special feed containing comments posted to the individual LWN article titled "Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 released". hourly 2 http://lwn.net/Articles/11011/rss 2002-09-26T12:34:19+00:00 da4089 re: gnutls ...<p>imo, the best way to distinguish gnutls from openssl is to make the programming api clear, simple, consistent, documented, etc.<p>openssl is a bit of a mess ... http://lwn.net/Articles/10976/rss 2002-09-26T04:24:04+00:00 joey Having a license that lets you link it to GPL'd code and distibrute the result is a good start.. http://lwn.net/Articles/10504/rss 2002-09-21T10:33:15+00:00 Peter <blockquote><p>"The glibc people never intended for NGPT to replace the old pthread library."</p> <p>[though, I can't think why not..]</p></blockquote> <p>My theory: NIH. glibc, being a GNU project, requires copyright assignments; perhaps the NGPT people were less than forthcoming at giving them.</p> <p>Alternate theory: as Uli notes in his announcement, they concluded that the complexity of MxN threading does not pay off in performance for realistic workloads, compared to simply optimising the kernel to handle large numbers of truly lightweight threads. MxN was all anyone talked about a few years ago, but more than one person in this thread <i>(no pun intended)</i> on linux-kernel has said 1x1 makes more sense. One such person is Larry McVoy, whom I'll trust on scalability issues any day. (Well, until he disagrees with Dave Miller, like on the numa clusters thing - hard to know which horse to bet on there!)</p> <p>Speaking of GNU NIH, does anyone know how does the gnutls project plans to differentiate themselves from openssl?</p> http://lwn.net/Articles/10493/rss 2002-09-20T18:05:57+00:00 Nero If you have a look at the discussion that followed the original post (you can find it on groups.google.com), this question was asked, Robert Love replied with something along the lines of &quot;The glibc people never intended for NGPT to replace the old pthread library.&quot;<p>[though, I can't think why not..] http://lwn.net/Articles/10477/rss 2002-09-20T15:48:41+00:00 Shewmaker I was under the impression that <a href"http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/pthreads/"> Next Generation POSIX Threads</a> were the future of threading on Linux. I know that it is a M:N implementation instead of 1:1, but I don't know much else. <p> Did NGPT already prove itself to be a poor solution or will we be seeing these two threading solutions duke it out? <p> -Andrew