| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
SCO director defends fight-back stance (ComputerWorld)SCO director defends fight-back stance (ComputerWorld)Posted Aug 26, 2004 14:57 UTC (Thu) by pglennon (guest, #649)Parent article: SCO director defends fight-back stance (ComputerWorld)
*yawn* wha? wha? are we still talking about sco? are they still around? wake me when it's over...
(Log in to post comments)
SCO director defends fight-back stance (ComputerWorld) Posted Aug 26, 2004 15:15 UTC (Thu) by chel (guest, #11544) [Link] They still have $45M in the bank and are burning $4M a quarter on legal costs, so put your alarm clock to ring in a year or three.
SCO director defends fight-back stance (ComputerWorld) Posted Aug 26, 2004 15:39 UTC (Thu) by steven97 (guest, #2702) [Link] Surely they'll burn cash a little quicker than that when they lose andIBM and RedHat sue for damages?
|
|
||||||||||||