| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Nice to see...Nice to see...Posted Aug 20, 2004 22:22 UTC (Fri) by Baylink (subscriber, #755)Parent article: Appeals court affirms Grokster decision
that a federal judiciary has ruled, in effect, that the doctrine of mandatory contributory infringement is crap: that as long as there *is* a legal use for a tool, that you're not a criminal for producing that tool.
Clearly, pipe bomb manufacturers should be criminals, but software companies?
Nuh-uh.
(Log in to post comments)
Nice to see... Posted Aug 20, 2004 22:46 UTC (Fri) by kasheon (guest, #24158) [Link] The user of the tool, not the tool, commits the crime. Should we punish3M for making paper because a crazed lunatic slashes his office workers with his notebook?
|
|
||||||||||||