| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
possibility for class actionpossibility for class actionPosted Aug 20, 2004 7:39 UTC (Fri) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)In reply to: possibility for class action by yodermk Parent article: IBM files another summary judgment motion
> Does violating the GPL on one program automatically mean you can't distribute *any* GPL software? That would seem to me like an excessively broad interpretation.
Yes, that would be a too broad interpretation indeed. However, if you knew that something was "illegal", would you still do it? Of course not. So, if SCO know that GPL is illegal, why are they continuing to break the law by using it? Isn't it unconstitutional to not ask for money for software distribution?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||